By Richard Florida
CityLab
he introduction of new technologies—from the steam engine in the 19th century to the moving assembly line in the 20th century to robotics in the 21st—is both economically potent and terribly disruptive. This is the process that the economist Joseph Schumpeter long ago dubbed “creative destruction,” the means by which new technologies disrupt old industries and generate entirely new ones.
While economically revolutionary, creative destruction can be socially painful, altering our social and economic structures and throwing large numbers of people out of work. Today, for example, we worry that robots will soon be able to perform more and more jobs currently performed by humans. One might think that such periods of rapid technological change would lead to widespread social disruption and considerable unhappiness.
But a new study by Princeton economist Angus Deaton and his collaborators Philippe Aghion, Ufuk Akcigit, and Alexandra Roulet finds just the opposite: Places that have highest levels of creative destruction and job turnover also have the highest levels of subjective well-being or happiness.
Read full coverage here.